Login/Registration

Users
Email address:

Password:

  Keep me logged in

Forgot your password?

Register
Lastest Scores (1/20/18)
[ All times EDT ]
NBA
503 PHI 89 FINAL
504 BOS 80
501 ORL 103 FINAL
502 CLE 104
505 MIN 98 FINAL
506 HOU 116
507 IND 86 FINAL
508 POR 100
801 SAN 83 FINAL
802 TOR 86
803 MIA 95 FINAL
804 BKN 101
805 WAS 122 FINAL
806 DET 112
807 SAC 88 FINAL
808 MEG 106
809 PHX 108 FINAL
810 DEN 100
811 NYK 117 FINAL
812 UTA 115
813 IND 86 FINAL
814 LAL 99
CBB
NORF 68 FINAL
NCAT 71
PPD ON JAN 17.
611 RMU 74 FINAL
612 SHU 60
599 PEAY 56 FINAL
600 TNST 70
BRY 79 FINAL
LIU 83
FDU 65 FINAL
CCSU 66
PRE 53 FINAL
WEBB 61
579 CIT 58 FINAL
580 UNCG 72
585 MER 62 FINAL
586 VMI 56
MASL 62 FINAL
ALBY 70
BING 66 FINAL
STON 77
519 UNCW 76 FINAL
520 COFC 80
MSM 73 FINAL
SFNY 81
SFPA 64 FINAL
WAG 73
587 JVST 58 FINAL
588 MORE 57
575 MURR 72 FINAL
576 BEL 79
583 NIAG 81 FINAL
584 QUIN 73
517 DEL 63 FINAL
518 HOFS 90
515 DREX 68 FINAL
516 TOWS 90
525 ELON 74 FINAL
526 JMU 85
509 NE 90 FINAL
510 WMMY 70
HART 86 FINAL
ME 68
UVM 67 FINAL
UNH 56
JAC 85 FINAL
SCUS 91
STET 81 FINAL
KENN 95
UNF 59 FINAL
NJIT 91
511 IUPU 67 FINAL
512 CLEV 70
513 UIC 92 FINAL
514 YSU 78
CHSO 47 FINAL
CAMP 62
LIB 60 FINAL
HP 71
LONG 63 FINAL
RAD 70
523 CHAR 64 FINAL
524 FAU 75
521 ODU 64 FINAL
522 FIU 54
581 MRST 65 FINAL
582 SIE 68
577 ETSU 62 FINAL
578 FUR 61
589 RID 88 FINAL
590 SPC 84
FGC 88 FINAL
LIP 83
527 UNT 65 FINAL
528 LT 66
531 NKU 91 FINAL
532 MILW 64
535 MTU 63 FINAL
536 MRSH 73
539 UVA 64 FINAL
540 GT 48
541 WAKE 63 FINAL
542 NCST 72
533 WSU 73 FINAL
534 COLO 82
591 WOF 93 FINAL
592 SAM 89
UVU 84 FINAL
UTRG 76
CSB 59 FINAL
UMKC 62
595 TNTC 70 FINAL
596 EKY 67
593 SEMO 86 FINAL
594 SIUE 74
537 WRST 80 FINAL
538 GB 67
529 RICE 75 FINAL
530 USM 86
GCAN 86 FINAL
CHS 58
543 CCAR 57 FINAL
544 USA 60
547 APP   POSTPONED
548 TROY
545 ULL 77 FINAL
546 UTA 65
605 EWU 81 FINAL
606 NAU 76
603 IDHO 80 FINAL
604 SUU 76
551 MINN 66 FINAL
552 MD 77
597 DEN 80 FINAL
598 NEBO 86
549 ULM 52 FINAL
550 TXST 55
601 UTM 60 FINAL
602 EIU 80
609 PRST 87 FINAL
610 IDST 83
613 UNCA 58 FINAL
614 WIN 85
553 MICH 52 FINAL
554 NEB 72
559 SMC 74 FINAL
560 GONZ 71
557 USC 75 FINAL
558 ORE 70
SEA 62 FINAL
NMSU 75
607 CSUS 64 FINAL
608 WEB 80
555 UAB 69 FINAL
556 WKU 77
563 PEPP 78 FINAL
564 PAC 92
561 PORT 55 FINAL
562 USD 49
565 WASH 62 FINAL
566 UTAH 70
567 CP 73 FINAL
568 UCI 80
571 SCU 65 FINAL
572 USF 62
573 LMU 67 FINAL
574 BYU 82
569 UCLA 63 FINAL
570 ORST 69
817 IND 57 FINAL
818 MSU 85
815 SBON 73 FINAL
816 DAV 83
819 BUFF 84 FINAL
820 WMU 74
827 IONA 76 FINAL
828 MONM 73
821 YALE 80 FINAL
822 BRWN 81
825 CAN 68 FINAL
826 MAN 59
823 ILL 50 FINAL
824 WIS 75
NHL
5 WAS 3 FINAL
6 NJD 4
1 BOS 5 FINAL
2 NYI 2
7 DAL 1 FINAL
8 CBS 2
11 BUF 3 FINAL
12 NYR 4
13 VGK 4 FINAL
14 TAM 1
9 STL 4 FINAL
10 OTT 1
3 TOR 2 FINAL
4 PHI 3
15 ARI 2 FINAL
16 NSH 3
17 SJS 3 FINAL
18 COL 5
19 PIT 3 FINAL
20 LOS 1
53 VGK 3 FINAL
54 FLA 4
51 MON 3 FINAL
52 WAS 2
55 LOS 1 FINAL
56 ANA 2
SOC
GTAR 2 FINAL
OSA 0
SNDR 1 FINAL
PALM 3
Group Stage
BTFG 0 FINAL
BRAG 2
Group Stage
BNGU 2 FINAL
VAS 0
Taça Guanabara
ALAJ 1 FINAL
MPZ 4
Clausura
MVIC 3 FINAL
WSYD 0
207933 ALAY 2 FINAL
207934 KASI 3
BCEL 0 FINAL
BIDV 1
203805 AZA 1 FINAL
203806 ULT 1
FSIT 0 FINAL
DORD 3
MAAS 1 FINAL
GAEG 3
JPSV 3 FINAL
DGR 2
UTII 0 FINAL
OSS 2
NEC 2 FINAL
ALMC 3
EIND 1 FINAL
TELS 4
VDAM 4 FINAL
HSPO 1
RKC 1 FINAL
EMMN 2
LHVR 1 FINAL
VNS 1
CNIR 1 FINAL
TOUR 2
NCY 0 FINAL
SCX 1
AJAC 2 FINAL
QUEV 0
AUX 3 FINAL
ORLN 2
CLFT 1 FINAL
LRN 1
LENS 1 FINAL
BST 1
REI 2 FINAL
BPER 0
206621 LISB 1 FINAL
206622 VSET 1
202545 BRD 1 FINAL
202546 HBL 1
204789 MOUS 0 FINAL
204790 RCHR 2
203393 MARS 2 FINAL
203394 CAE 0
200325 BCIT 0 FINAL
200326 DRBY 0
CRWT 1 FINAL
NEWP 2
201881 ATH 2 FINAL
201882 GET 2
RLZ 1 FINAL
GRA 2
COVE   POSTPONED
FRMR
4th Round
206637 TNDL 0 FINAL
206638 FCP 1
209273 VCRZ 0 FINAL
209274 PUE 2
Clausura
OAXA 3 FINAL
UAEM 3
Clausura
UGUA 1 FINAL
MZAC 2
Clausura
MNGA 4 FINAL
JVTS 0
JUAR 0 FINAL
CRRC 0
Clausura
TMPC 0 FINAL
ASLS 0
Clausura
CHOR 0 FINAL
SFRN 0
209277 TOL 3 FINAL
209278 ALS 1
Clausura
WELL 3 FINAL
NJTS 2
CCM 1 FINAL
SYDN 1

How We Do Business

SportsBetTech.com utilizes a proprietary handicapping process (software enhanced) that essentially handicaps the handicapper. Make no mistake about it. One of the many critical components of successful handicapping is the accumulation of critical real time relevant information on a respective game. However, without a general understanding of the athletes for the sport, such as player psychology over the course of a season, a handicapper will continue to operate at too much of a disadvantage. All handicappers will possess a stronger "feel" for one or several teams over the balance of a particular league, and one or two sports generally better than other gaming sports (e.g., NFL and NCAA Hoops better than NHL & NBA).


Gaming lines are set or moved to promote even action or offset public perception perceived in error!


At SportsBetTech, we analyze the "lined-games" for all the sports/leagues that we support. While adhering to a "strict cash management process" is the absolute starting point for any PROFIT ORIENTED sports handicapper, "a majority of all plays must be successful!." Consequently, barring an unusual situational event for a particular game (e.g., weather, last second sickness or injury, ineligible player, etc.), SportsBetTech believes that all plays should be given equal weight. Following is the foundation for our argument:

  • Aside from the "unusual situational games" that occur infrequently (spread among all of the gaming sports), the balance of the sport schedules will only play out based on general handicapping principles and discipline.
  • Those handicappers who give out rated plays are potentially playing with fire... and their client's money. If a play is merely a statistical and or trend analysis recommendation, why would the confidence of one such game date match up be any more or less confident than another... enough to play all such recommendations but for varying weighted sums:
  1. Under a weighted wager system, a winning percentage on game date results could still produce capital losses for that day, resulting in lost opportunity;
  2. Under a weighted wager system, a win on a heavier weighted play, despite losses on higher quantity lesser weighted plays, merely, and certainly potentially, sets up the player for "bankroll washout" on the day when such heavier weighted plays do not come in... days that are inevitable in this business;

What is an example of an "unusual situational event" game?

In the '08-'09 NFL Season, there was a game played in the 17th week of regulation in Buffalo between the Bills and the Patriots Patriots. At the beginning of the week the opening Total was 43. Early in the morning on the Sunday game date, the weather man reported that there would be very strong winds in Buffalo... upwards towards 40-50 mph (or more). The line was adjusted immediately upon the Sportsbooks opening for business. SportsBetTech knew that the Patriots very potent passing game would be rendered effectively useless. The statistics also showed... sans the weather report... that the Bills had little passing game going into that game, and even less incentive to play knowing they had no shot at the playoffs. SportsBetTech was able to buy the game heavy on the UNDER at 35.5. It closed at 34. The final score: NE:13 BB: 0. The weather made the game "situational." The fact that the oddsmaker could not adjust the line enough to compensate for the "situational event" made the game quite unusual.

Unless one of the teams had a "superior" running game, the two teams playing in that game were not very relevant. The weather dictated that the game "could only be played on the ground" and that neither team would score much, if at all. Such events occur 2-5 times a year. When we find such games (events), we will advise our PREMIUM Subscribers about the opportunity by e-mail and/or text message, so that they can take advantage of this situation. This is part of our professional commitment of excellence to each Subscriber.


The SportsBetTech MAS was developed, because there are simply too many games for investors to analyze themselves to identify "Value"!


Generally, during the regular season, the oddsmakers' lines will be much tighter, or more closely resemble the match up between the teams in marquee games. However, often non-marquee games, or games between one marquee team and one non-marquee team, oddsmakers will offer lines that are simply not justified by the statistical match-ups.

In such statistical anomaly match-ups, the oddsmakers will set the lines much closer to "public perception" rather than the more accurate statistical relationship between the teams. This is why many very mediocre pitchers today, playing on teams barely above or below a .500 record, are being assessed favored money lines from -150 to -200 (or more). The lines for these games could easily be argued to be even picks! (Note: For over valued chalk games, the Dog would be labeled a "value play" by SportsBetTech...ideal for light action or as part of a 3 Team Round Robin play). The oddsmakers have likely has participated in the setting of over-valued lines in MLB action to give them a greater edge over the player on two principals:

  1. Greater juice requires a greater winning percentage for the player to merely break even over the course of time.
  2. The higher juice games lower the "Run Line" favorable odds, thus creating lower payouts to the player and giving the "house" further insurance. Now the chalk team now has to win by two or more runs...not just one;

In conclusion, finding "value" plays not only requires knowledge of the statistical match-ups between the teams, but also a relational analysis of the money lines and spreads that identify each game date match up. It is simply impossible for a non-professional player to dedicate the time and resources to successfully achieve this goal.

Conclusion

SportsBetTech management has seen a myriad of changes in the sports investment arena over the last 25+ years, and the Internet represents an invaluable tool to support those changes. However, the amount of data that has to be analyzed to find value in ever-tightening oddsmakers' linees continues to grow. There is no magic window to forecasting future events (e.g., predicting outcomes). SportsBetTech has removed emotion from the analysis and prejudice from its recommendations. We grade ourselves constantly on our accuracy (Winners and Losers), and post all of our results SportsBetTech Picks Archive. Furthermore, we ask ourselves the following four questions every day:

  1. Did our wins come in as analyzed or did we merely catch a lucky break?
  2. Did we lose a game in "bad beat" fashion (which all players must live with as acceptable, because you will win games that way as well) or was the call completely wrong (e.g., learn from adversity)?
  3. Did we take advantage of critical last minute data that was available?
  4. Did we miss a game date match-up that had value written all over it?